By
Hank Reineke
The first thing you note when reading the sleeve notes
for 100 Years of Horror (Mill Creek Entertainment)
is the three-disc set’s staggering running time: ten hours and fifty-five
minutes. It’s a somewhat daunting task
to review such a monumentally staged effort as this, one at least partially
conceived as a labor-of-love. The series
makes a noble effort to trace the history and the development of the horror
film from the silent era through the slasher films of the 1980s and a bit
beyond, not always neatly or logically compartmentalizing sub-genres as
“Dinosaurs,†“Aliens†“Gore,†“Mutants,†Scream Queens†etc. along the way. It’s a bit difficult to precisely date when host
and horror film icon Christopher Lee’s commentaries and introductory segments
were filmed. The set itself carries a
1996 copyright, but Lee makes an off-hand mention of the “new†Dracula film
starring Gary Oldman… which would date the saturnine actor’s participation to
1992 or thereabouts. Later in the set,
Lee references Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein,
which then confusingly forward dates the documentary to 1994.
It’s also unclear where this series was originally
destined. With its twenty-five minute
running time per episode, it would appear as if this twenty-six part series was
produced with the intent of television distribution in mind. 100
Years of Horror is one of the earliest efforts of executive producer Dante
J. Pugliese who would carve out a career producing a number of these minimal
investment “clip show†style documentaries. This series first appeared as a 5 volume VHS set via Passport
International in the latter days of 1995, and has since enjoyed several DVD
releases; there were both cut-down versions and a
highly-sought-after-by-collectors box set issued in 2006. This new issue by Mill Creek not only brings
the set back into print with new packaging, but does so at a very reasonable
price point: MSRP: $14.98, and even
cheaper from the usual assortment of on-line merchants.
Perhaps acknowledging Christopher Lee’s contribution to
the legacy, the series first episode is fittingly dedicated to Dracula and his Disciples. Lee was, inarguably, one of the two most
iconic figures to essay the role of Count Dracula. Though Bela Lugosi’s halting speaking manner,
grey pallor and widow-peaked hairline remains the more iconic visual portraiture,
Lugosi actually only portrayed Count Dracula in a feature-length film twice: in
the 1931 original and, for the final time, in Abbott and Costello Meet Frankenstein (1948). Lee, on the other hand, shot no less than seven
Dracula films for Hammer Studios and one for Jess Franco. Though he would log considerably more
cinematic hours on screen as the Prince of Darkness, the gentlemanly Lee
generously allows here that even some forty years following the actor’s death
in 1956, Bela Lugosi was still “inexorably linked†to the public’s persona of
Dracula.
Though he would never work with the actor – as he would on
two occasions with Lugosi’s occasional foil Boris Karloff - Lee recalled his first
attendance at a horror film in a cinema was Lugosi’s Dark Eyes of London (1939). Lugosi would, in some manner of speaking, unwittingly pave the way for
Lee’s future assumption in other similarly cloaked roles. As had his predecessor,
Lee would portray several other vampire characters on film that were Count Dracula
in all but name. Just as Lugosi would exploit
his image as Transylvania’s most famous resident in such films as Return of the Vampire and Mark of the Vampire, so would a fanged
Christopher Lee with such impersonations as Dracula
and Son and Uncle Was a Vampire.
The documentary makes clear that, no matter how celebrated
either man’s portrayal was, neither actor held dominion on the character. The film points out that several other actors
- Francis Lederer and Lon Chaney Jr. among them – have tackled the role to reasonable
degrees of satisfaction. It was also
pleasing to see a brief interview segment with one of my favorite Dracula’s,
the wizened John Carradine, captured in his eighties here. Carradine triumphantly recounts not only did
he appear as Dracula in “three†films for Universal (well, three, if you choose
to count his appearance on a 1977 episode of NBC-TV’s McCloud (“McCloud Meets Draculaâ€). Carradine was also mysteriously prideful of his appearing as a Count
Dracula-style character in several obscure films shot in Mexico (Las Vampiras) and the Philippines (the
outrageous and exploitative Vampire
Hookers). What the Mexican and
Filipino efforts might lack in comprehensibility and budget, they’re nonetheless
not-to-be-missed totems of low-brow Midnight Movie Madness. For whatever reason, Carradine made no
mention of his top-hatted participation the wild and wooly William (“One Shotâ€)
Beaudine western Billy the Kid vs.
Dracula (1966), a long-time “guilty pleasure†of mine.
Many of the featured players of the Universal Studios era
of the Golden Age of Horror were gone by the 1960s and 1970s, so many of the on-camera
reminiscences from this era are left to be re-conjured by surviving family
members. Hoping to put a rest to the
rumors that his father was not on good terms with Boris Karloff, Bela Lugosi
Jr. contends any suggestions of a rivalry between the two were professional and
not personal. As early as the mid-1930s Karloff
was getting the better paying and more interesting roles. Bela was often toiling
in a series of mystery-horrors for such cheapie studios as Monogram. The younger Lugosi admits his father had paid
dearly for passing on the opportunity of portraying the monster in the first
Universal Frankenstein film of
1931. As the script called for the
monster to be mute throughout the feature, the prideful Lugosi thought his
acceptance of the role would be a “misuse of his talent.†He would later regret his decision, as it was
one that would seal his fate - during the course of his working life, at the
very least - as a second-tier boogeyman to “Karloff the Uncanny.†The role of the Monster was eventually
consigned to Karloff, whose masterful performance in both the original and two
sequels (Bride of Frankenstein and Son of Frankenstein) made the sinister Englishman
a bona fide worldwide star.
As might be expected with any documentary series of ambitious
scope, there is a bit of accommodation made for the sake of inclusivity. The episode celebrating the cinematic legacy
of Robert Louis Stevenson’s “The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde†(first
published 1886), is presented somewhat chronologically with mentions of various
rare silent shorts and a deeper look at John Barrymore’s more famous silent
version of 1920. The most celebrated
version is the 1931 Paramount version with Fredric March, a film shot very much
in the tradition of the two recent Universal features, but for which March received
an Academy Award – the first such honor to be bestowed upon a Hollywood horror
film.
It’s also here that the filmmakers tenuously stretch the
definition of films encapsulating a Jekyll/Hyde formula. They suggest such films as diverse as
Universal’s Black Friday, Monogram’s The Mad Monster, The Hideous Sun Demon, and Jerry Lewis’ The Nutty Professor - amongst others - are kindred spirits. While I concede these tales are allegorical
to the original Stevenson novel, they’re original works in their own
right. Let’s face it; a monster movie
without a mad scientist lurking about and causing mayhem is hardly worth
watching. The most fun moments of the Jekyll
and Hyde episode belong exclusively to the Brits. The first features the beautiful Martine
Beswick complaining that producers at Hammer Films were continually pushing her
to bare more of the bountiful gift that was her body than had been mutually
agreed upon when signed on for Dr. Jekyll
and Sister Hyde. Christopher Lee
took the producers at Amicus to task for their retention of every original name
of every major and minor Stevenson character in their feature I, Monster. That is, of course, for
Lee’s principal character, whose name was changed from Jekyll and Hyde to
Marlowe and Blake for no apparent reason.
There are, very welcomingly, interviews with a lot of old
hands from Hammer Studios. As one might
expect, this set’s segment celebrating the legacy of Baron Frankenstein was
largely dedicated to the memory of Peter Cushing. The skeletal and genial actor would famously appear
as the maniacal and obsessed Baron in six of the seven Frankenstein features
produced by Hammer 1957-1973. Lee offers
that his very old and dear friend and colleague brought a “decadent eleganceâ€
to the role, suggesting that, to three generations of cinemagoers, Cushing was
the one and only Baron Frankenstein. Thanks to the advent of home video, I’m sure that yet another generation
or two can be added to that total… there was, simply, no one better in that
role. The filmmakers also point out that
beginning in the 1950’s, stateside independent producers would “Americanizeâ€
the Frankenstein film legacy for the teen market. Though Dr. Frankenstein were originally of
European descent – a Baron, no less - A.I.P, Embassy Pictures and many other
low-budget programmers chose to bring such “Made in America†creations to the
screens of drive-ins across the U.S.A. Who wouldn’t want to catch a midnight movie with a crass title like I Was a Teenage Frankenstein, How To Make a Monster, or Jesse James Meets Frankenstein’s Daughter?

Though Christopher Lee’s introductions and occasional
appearances throughout tie the narrative line together, each episode is
stitched together with brief interviews of film technicians and actors,
excerpts from still photographs and no shortage of scenes excised from free-use
trailers. If a particular film is
particularly old or has fallen into public domain status, there’s a good chance
we will be treated to an extended showcase of moments from that film. Sadly, these extended segments of public
domain films – most very familiar to obsessive fans - tend to drag down the
pace of several episodes; you get the uneasy feeling they’re mostly included to
pad the running time and allow the writers a lengthy lunch break. Having said this, should you choose to go forage
a snack from the kitchen during one such extended interlude, you do so at your
own peril. There’s a very good chance
you might miss a brilliantly inserted snippet of celebrity gossip or a backstage
technician’s erudite observation.
Much to the filmmaker’s credit, there’s nary a then-surviving
member of the horror film fraternity who doesn’t offer commentary throughout
the set. You can check out this film’s
IMDB extensive cast list to see who is on hand here to share a memory or two,
no matter how brief. These interviews,
to me, are the most illuminating part of the set. As mentioned earlier, Karloff
and Lugosi (and Chaney, Atwill, Zucco et. al.) were already long gone and
unable to contribute, but remembrances of the “Golden Age†are shared by such
veterans as Turhan Bey, Peggy Moran and Nina Foch. In the case of Karloff’s biography, the team
behind the documentary’s production has made good use of snippets of vintage television
footage sourced from such programs as the Carol
Burnett Show, Route 66, Thriller, and This Is Your Life. Footage
excerpted from Lugosi’s semi-famous shipboard interview of December 1951 is
also used, as is a scene from Hollywood
On Parade where Bela puts the bite on American sweetheart, Betty Boop.
Originally, and perhaps more sensibly, conceived as a documentary
of two hours, a decision was made along the line to expand the material sale to
the British television market. While new
and old fans will surely be schooled in many facets of classic horror lore, it
must be said some episodes are better researched and written than others that serve
mostly as nothing but clip shows. The
series definitely benefits when writer-producer-horror historian Ted Newsom
jumps aboard and helps more knowledgeably guide the ship. It is a pity that the set has not been afforded
an HD transfer to Blu. After a few
episodes I had to abandon watching these documentaries on the 56†set in the
living room – image quality varies wildly from acceptable to mildly blurry to near
headache-inducing. The set appears
slightly less compromised on the 27†small format flat screen in the
bedroom. I also found the set not terribly
conducive to binge-watching. There are
several re-uses of Lee’s voice-over commentaries and plenty of double and
triple dips of familiar trailer and archival footage… the repetition does get
tiring after a bit. I’d suggest playing
an episode or two of 100 Years of Horror
as a prelude before settling down for your Saturday night monster movie.
(The DVD set includes a digital download version.)
CLICK HERE TO ORDER FROM AMAZON