Kudos to Kino: the video company has released a boxed set of the acclaimed AFT feature films.
By Raymond Benson
.
Want
to go see a Broadway or West End stage play—but at the local cinema? No, it’s not a filmed stage production. It’s a play translated to the film medium,
but with complete faithfulness to the original play script. Not only that, it stars big name actors and
is directed by a top-notch director. To
complete the conceit, you get handed a playbill (program) when you enter the
theater. There might even be an
intermission—or two! And you have only four
showtimes at which you can view the picture before it disappears, and you have
to buy your ticket in advance with a subscription for a whole “season†of these
filmed plays, or staged films, or whatever you want to call them.
This
was the unique and exciting experiment called the American Film Theatre.
Back
in 1973, producer Ely Landau launched this daring and unprecedented cinema
series that played in the U.S. for two “seasons,†with a total of fourteen
titles (but only thirteen were shown), all renowned works—classic and modern—originally
produced on the stage. Landau and his
wife Edie were not Broadway producers, but they were Theatre People and had
helped launch the “Play of the Week†series on PBS television, produced Sidney
Lumet’s film version of Eugene O’Neill’s Long
Day’s Journey Into Night (1962), and were keen on inventing a way to make
Broadway (or the London stage) accessible to everyone in America—at their local
movie theater.
There
have always been stage plays adapted for film—A Streetcar Named Desire, for example, or The Miracle Worker, or Hamlet. But plays like these were “re-imagined†for
the film medium—the script was often changed or re-written with added or
deleted scenes, the action was “opened up†to include locations outside of a
single, claustrophobic stage set, and the roles were usually re-cast with
“Hollywood actors†rather than “Broadway actors.â€Â Then there were also the few stage
productions that were filmed as is, i.e., cameras were set up in front of an
actual proscenium stage while an already-rehearsed play was performed and the
cameras simply recorded the production. Waiting for Godot (1961), for example,
was done this way for television.Â
The
American Film Theatre concept tried something different. The directive was to take a great stage play,
not change a word, and in most cases,
use the actual play script as the screenplay.Â
The next step was to hire an accomplished film director to interpret the
text for the film medium but stay
faithful to the play. Sometimes the
director was the same person who helmed the original stage production. A further step was to persuade the original
casts from the Broadway or London productions of those plays to star in the
film; or, when that wasn’t possible, to cast big-name Hollywood or British
actors. Thus, the result was indeed a
filmed play—but you as an audience member wouldn’t be watching it from the
middle of the orchestra or from the side or from the first balcony; instead you
were up close and personal in a realistically-presented world (on studio sets
and/or real interior or exterior locations)—just like in “regular†movies. You had the best seat in the house, so to
speak, but there’s no proscenium arch.Â
It’s a movie. But it’s a
play. Get it?Â
Landau
didn’t have a lot of money to produce the series. Getting the rights to the plays was the easy
part. In most cases, if the playwright
was still living, he was more than happy to take a modest fee to see his play
translated faithfully to the screen.Â
Edward Albee, for example, had already gone through a Hollywood
experience with Who’s Afraid of Virginia
Woolf? During that production, he
and producer/screenwriter Ernest Lehman often clashed over the script until
Lehman finally gave in and used Albee’s original play text as the film script
almost verbatim (and yet Lehman was credited for the screenplay and received an
Oscar nomination for it!). So, when
Landau approached Albee about doing A
Delicate Balance in the American Film Theatre with promises that the actual
play would be the screenplay, and Albee would have director and cast approval,
the playwright jumped at the chance. Landau
collected the rights to the plays he wanted in this manner and started from
scratch with every production, except for two.Â
Three Sisters, from the Anton
Chekhov play and directed by Laurence Olivier, had already been produced and
released in Britain only in 1970. Philadelphia, Here I Come!, from the
Brian Friel play and directed by John Quested, was an Irish production set to
be released in 1975. Landau bought the
U.S. distribution rights for both films and presented them as two of the
entries in the AFT program. Thus, Three Sisters and Philadelphia, Here I Come! were the only pictures in the entire two
seasons that Landau and his team did not produce.
The
talent (directors, actors, designers, technicians) was asked to work at a
reduced rate or at scale. No one
refused. It was for a cause they all
thought was worthwhile. Lee Marvin, for
example, joked that he “lost $225,000†by starring in The Iceman Cometh (which meant he did the movie for only
$25,000—his going rate at the time was $250,000).Â
Grants
from American Express and other organizations helped fill out the rest of the
production costs. Finally, audiences
were asked to subscribe in advance to a certain number of films in a particular
season. They could buy tickets for the
entire season or a lesser selection if they desired. Only four performances per film were shown at
selective theaters around the country—simultaneously—and a new film premiered
every month. Just like theatre, only in
the cinema.Â
Being
a Theatre Person (defined as someone who has studied and worked in the theatre—I
was majoring in Drama at the University of Texas at Austin in the fall of 1973
when the American Film Theatre premiered)—I found the series exhilarating. Most people who appreciated and knew the theatre loved it. They understood and “got†what Landau and his
team were trying to do. Unfortunately,
the rest of the public met the series with a collective shrug. Film critics complained that the films were
“too much like stage plays†(duh!).Â
True, many of the productions were a bit claustrophobic because, like
the original plays, they took place in single settings. In only a few cases were the plays “opened
up†to include scenes outdoors (such as Rhinoceros
and Lost in the Stars). What the critics didn’t understand was that
the series was created to celebrate playwrights,
and so the emphasis was on the plays. With
great acting. And wonderful
direction.Â
Speaking
of the acting, I assert that the AFT series contained some of the best performances
one can see on the silver screen—ever. It’s a shame that none of the films were
eligible for Academy Award consideration (due to the limited showings and non-traditional
distribution); otherwise we would have seen many of the AFT’s stars up for
Oscars. Only one of the films, The Man in the Glass Booth, was released
in a regular theatrical run in 1975 after the AFT seasons were finished—and
Maximilian Schell was indeed nominated for a Best Actor Oscar for his role in
the picture.Â
AFT’s
first season consisted of eight films/plays.Â
Beginning in October 1973, one picture played each month through May
1974. The second season consisted of six
features (only five were actually shown) and ran in 1975.Â
Â
Following
the run of the second season, the films disappeared from public viewing (except
for The Man in the Glass Booth). They were all re-issued theatrically in selected
markets about a year later. Some time
after that they were run on HBO. Then, after
the new millennium, the excellent video company Kino International Inc. released
the entire series on DVD. All fourteen
features are now available in a deluxe box set that is worth every penny of its
retail price, despite the fact that none of the films were digitally restored. (See www.kino.com
for information on how to buy this set, as well as other great film classics.)
As
with any cinema series, some entries are better than others. Here is an assessment of each American Film
Theatre picture with a rating based on a 5-star system.Â
The Iceman Cometh
The Iceman Cometh by Eugene O’Neill (October
1973)
Directed
by John Frankenheimer; Starring Lee Marvin, Fredric March, Robert Ryan, Jeff
Bridges, Bradford Dillman, Moses Gunn.
What
a cast! The premiere AFT feature
presented one of the better acting ensembles of the series. It’s a tough movie to watch, though—the play
is terribly depressing and long
(O’Neill was known for his epic works).Â
It’s a four-hour movie, with two intermissions, and the action takes
place entirely inside a dark, gloomy Irish bar in 1912 New York. It’s a world of lost souls and hopeless
drunks, and we get to know each character intimately. Lee Marvin plays Hickey, the traveling
salesman whose imminent visit everyone looks forward to. Hickey is always the life of the party,
buying drinks for all and leading everyone on a binge. But this time Hickey arrives sober and spends
the play trying to convert his friends into going on the wagon. While Marvin has the showy role and is quite
good, it is Robert Ryan, as Larry Slade (the play’s true protagonist) who is
the heart and soul of the film. Ryan
gives the performance of his career and it’s a shame it was ineligible for
Academy recognition. Fredric March is
also excellent (both March and Ryan died shortly after the film’s
completion—this was their final film).Â
Young Jeff Bridges is winning and the rest of the character-role ensemble
is magnificent. Yes, it’s long. It’s a struggle at times. But in the end, you feel as if you’ve made a
significant journey to hell and back. 5
stars.
The Homecoming
The Homecoming by Harold Pinter
(November 1973)
Directed
by Peter Hall; Starring Paul Rogers, Ian Holm, Vivien Merchant, Cyril Cusack,
Terence Rigby, Michael Jayston.
For
my money, this feature is the most successful entry in the entire AFT
series. Pinter is terribly difficult to
pull off, and luckily Landau managed to get the original London cast and
director for this production. Pinter’s
plays have been called “theatre of menace†and this, his Tony-winning,
best-known work, is the quintessential example.Â
The story is about the ultimate British dysfunctional family—a crotchety
old patriarch (Rogers), his wimpy brother (Cusack), his two hateful sons (Holm,
Jayston), and the prodigal son (Rigby) who unexpectedly comes home for a visit
with a new wife (Merchant). After a
series of creepy—but hilarious—scenes, the family decides they will all share
the new wife. The cast is excellent,
especially Rogers and a young Ian Holm, who was one of Pinter’s longtime stage
interpreters. This is black comedy—very
black—at its finest. If you’ve never
seen a Pinter play, this is a must-see.Â
One of the best films of 1973, in or outside of the American Film
Theatre! 5 stars.
A Delicate Balance by Edward Albee
(December 1973)
Directed
by Tony Richardson; Starring Katharine Hepburn, Paul Scofield, Kate Reid, Lee
Remick, Joseph Cotten, Betsy Blair.
Albee
seems to love dysfunctional families, too.Â
This is a story of upper-class WASPs with all kinds of problems—mostly
alcoholism affecting at least two members of the clan—and a surprise visit from
their “best friends†who are suffering from some kind of mysterious,
inexplicable terror. The friends want to
move in and stay permanently. Albee’s
Pulitzer Prize winning play is a powerful drama with excellent character
studies. Again, the acting is
superb—where else are you going to see Hepburn, Scofield, Cotten, Blair,
Remick, and Reid all in the same room busting each other’s chops? But while the production is a good one, it’s
not great. The pacing is slow and the
setting indeed seems surprisingly more static than the bar in Iceman Cometh. Richardson could have pushed for a little
more dynamics in the tempo and rhythms of the play, and then it would have been
even more of a class act. Still, it’s
worthwhile. 3 stars.
Rhinoceros by Eugene Ionesco
(January 1974)
Directed
by Tom O’Horgan; Starring Zero Mostel, Gene Wilder, Karen Black.
Rhinoceros is an archetypal
example of the so-called “theatre of the absurd†movement on the stage in the
50s and 60s. The problem with adapting
it to the screen is that these types of plays are specifically theatrical in nature.Â
They depend on allegory, symbolism, metaphor, and surrealism that cannot
be accomplished in a realistic presentation.Â
O’Horgan, the man who directed Hair
on Broadway, valiantly attempts to place this very surrealistic play into a
modern, naturalistic city setting. It
doesn’t work. The story: people all around an alcoholic Everyman
(Wilder) are inexplicably turning into rhinoceroses. Of course, this is an allegory for
Communism/Fascism. What makes the film
moderately amusing and watchable are, again, the performances by Mostel (who
originated the role of John/Jean on Broadway) and Wilder. They are such a pleasure to watch. Unfortunately O’Horgan has inserted a
pop-song soundtrack (composed by Hair’s
Gerome Ragni) and the thing just feels like it’s trying too hard to be “hip.â€Â 2 stars.
Luther by John Osborne
(February 1974)
Directed
by Guy Green; Starring Stacy Keach, Julian Glover, Leonard Rossiter, Patrick
Magee, Judi Dench, Maurice Denham, Hugh Griffith, Robert Stephens.
Osborne,
the author of Look Back in Anger,
wrote this poetic treatment of the life of Martin Luther, the man who
“invented†Protestantism. The play is
episodic, covering many years of Luther’s life from the time in which he was a
confused and doubting monk to the point when he is put on trial by the Catholic
bishops and excommunicated. It is an
engaging, well-acted production. Keach
is marvelous in the lead role, and the other fine British actors such as Magee
and Denham, especially, are top-notch. A
young Judi Dench has a small role toward the end as a nun-turned-Luther’s
wife. Green’s direction is remarkably
faithful in translating the stage transitions as indicated in the original
playscript to the screen medium. One of
the better entries in the series. 4
stars.
Three Sisters by Anton Chekhov
(March 1974)
Directed
by Laurence Olivier; Starring The Royal National Theatre Company (including
Joan Plowright, Jeanne Watts, Louise Purnell, Derek Jacobi, Laurence Olivier,
Sheila Reid, Ronald Pickup) and Alan Bates.
As
mentioned above, Three Sisters was a
film already produced and released in Britain in 1970, and therefore was not
made by Ely Landau and the AFT. The film
is a recreation of the National Theatre’s highly successful and
critically-acclaimed 1969 production of the play, so it is much more “stageyâ€
than any of the other films in the AFT series.Â
(Bates was not a member of the company, hence he received separate
billing.)Â Even as a Theatre Person, I
will forever wonder why Chekhov’s plays are considered “comedies,†for they are
usually dry, light dramas about
middle-class Russian families in crises involving relationships and
careers. While this production may have
been very absorbing on stage, on film it is, frankly, a bit stuffy. Nevertheless, the cast is excellent and it’s
probably the closest thing to a dead-on, faithful rendition of Chekhov on the
screen that you’ll ever see. Unfortunately,
the DVD has some sound issues—the dialogue sounds as if it was recorded in a
barrel—but this could also be a symptom of the original film’s mix. 3 stars.
Butley by Simon Gray
(April 1974)
Directed
by Harold Pinter; Starring Alan Bates, Jessica Tandy, Richard O’Callaghan,
Michael Byrne, Susan Engel.
It
seems when Pinter is involved in an AFT production, it turns out very
well. Butley is one of the best entries in the series, mainly due to the
tour-de-force performance by Alan Bates in the title role as an alcoholic, razor-witted
schoolteacher who is left by his wife and his male lover on the same day. If there was ever any doubt that Bates was
one of the greatest actors of the 20th Century, then Butley is the film to see. The actor dominates the production in every
frame. Even though he plays a despicable
cad, his charisma and exuberance is infectious.Â
If the film had been allowed to compete at that year’s Oscars, Bates
surely would have been a contender. Pinter
made his directorial debut with the picture and it exhibits confidence and
style. One of the best films of 1974, in
or outside of the AFT. 5 stars.
Lost in the Stars by Maxwell Anderson
and Kurt Weill (May 1974)
Directed
by Daniel Mann; Starring Brock Peters, Melba Moore, Paul Rogers, Clifton Davis,
Raymond St. Jacques.
This
is one of two musicals produced by the AFT, and it’s a surprisingly good
one. Anderson adapted the original stage
show from Alan Paton’s novel Cry, the
Beloved Country (book and lyrics), while Weill provided the music. The story concerns a poor black preacher’s
search for his missing son in apartheid South Africa, only to find that the
young man has been arrested for the murder of a white man. The son goes on trial and is sentenced to
hang. The preacher’s faith in God and
humanity is shaken. End of story. A nice, cheery subject matter for a
musical. Regardless of the downer
storyline, there is a lot of heart in the material. The nearly all-black cast does a splendid
job, especially with the singing. Unlike
the other AFT productions, this one was filmed on location in Jamaica (doubling
as South Africa) with many exterior settings.Â
It’s a refreshing change from the rest of the series. Not spectacular, but worth watching. 3 stars.
Galileo by Bertolt Brecht
(January 1975)
Directed
by Joseph Losey; Starring Topol, Edward Fox, Tom Conti, Michael Lonsdale, Judy
Parfitt, John Gielgud, Patrick Magee, John McEnery, Colin Blakely, Mary Larkin,
Richard O’Callaghan.
Tricky
business, attempting to film Brecht.Â
After all, the playwright invented a theatrical language all his own
(known as “epic theatreâ€) in which the medium made no attempts to hide the fact
that audiences were indeed watching a theatrical production—more akin to Greek
drama than most 20th Century theatre. Characters often broke the fourth wall of the
proscenium arch to address the audience directly and “comment†on the
action. Music and songs were used, often
as narration, delivered by characters or a Chorus. Director Losey staged the first American
production of Galileo, so he was the
perfect choice to adapt it to the screen (the play was adapted from German by
Charles Laughton in the 1940s and worked with Brecht himself for that
production). Losey actually succeeds in re-creating
the Brechtian theatrical conventions for the screen—a Chorus of three young
boys sing narration directly to the camera, Galileo often addresses the
audience, and sometimes stage rigging can be seen in the set pieces—and yet,
this is a movie—and a very good one.Â
Starring such renowned actors as Topol (in the title role) and a host of
British stage superstars, it’s the fascinating story of the scientist’s clash
with the Catholic Church preceding the Age of Reason. On first release, the film was positively received
except for the casting of Topol, whose performance supposedly didn’t fit in
with the rest of the production. I
disagree—he’s marvelous, and the supporting cast is all superb. It’s not a perfect film, but it’s a darned
good one—certainly an admirable representation of Brecht and his work. 4 stars.
Jacques Brel is
Alive and Well and Living in Paris by Jacques Brel, Eric Blau, Mort Shuman
(February 1975)
Directed
by Denis Heroux; Starring Elly Stone, Mort Shuman, Joe Masiell, Jacques Brel.
The
original musical was a very popular Off-Broadway extravaganza from the late
sixties that was really a plot-less revue/concert of the songs of Belgian
Jacques Brel (translated into English by Shuman and Blau). On stage, it was a
delightful potpourri of musical vignettes performed entirely by four
actor/singers. This does not translate
well to the film medium. Heroux stages
the songs in surreal, music-video-style shorts that call more attention to the
pretentiousness of the concept than it does the music. While the performers are fine (especially
Brel himself in a “cameo†number), the production tries too hard to be
imaginatively trendy, when all it really succeeds in is unintentional
silliness. Luckily, director Heroux
fared much better in later years as a producer (Atlantic City, Quest for Fire). If you like the songs you may enjoy the film,
otherwise it’s a curiosity. 1 star.
In Celebration by David Storey
(March 1975)
Directed
by Lindsay Anderson; Starring Alan Bates, Brian Cox, James Bolam, Bill Owen,
Constance Chapman.
A
story about yet another dysfunctional British family, this one takes place in
Yorkshire as three grown sons return home to celebrate their parents’ 40th
wedding anniversary. But apparently
there are long-squelched secrets that need to bubble to the surface, so what
starts out as an uneasy reunion turns ugly.Â
Bates (again) is superb as the eldest (and trouble-making) son, but it
is Cox who is strikingly charismatic as the silent, youngest young man on the
verge of a breakdown. And then there’s
the unseen, ever-present specter of the son who died at age seven. The film imported the cast directly from the
original Royal Court Theatre production.Â
One of the better entries; compelling and poignant. 4 stars.
The Maids by Jean Genet
(April 1975)
Directed
by Christopher Miles; Starring Glenda Jackson, Susannah York, Vivien Merchant.
One
has to understand a little about Genet the man in order to appreciate his
plays. He had a decidedly kinky world
outlook, and this is very clear when one knows that his original intention for The Maids was that it be performed by an
all-male cast in drag (it almost never is).Â
The story concerns two sisters who are maids to a wealthy socialite. When Madame is away, the sisters role-play
sadomasochistic scenarios in which one of them portrays Madame and the other
enacts one of the sisters. They never
seem to get to finish the fantasy—in which Madame is supposed to be murdered—before
they are interrupted by the real Madame’s return. The three actresses are superb in this
faithful adaptation of their London stage production. Audiences unfamiliar with the source material,
however, will find it very strange
and unsettling (as it should be). Not for
everyone, but it’s a challenging and intelligent piece of work. 3 stars.
The Man in the
Glass Booth
by Robert Shaw (May 1975)
Directed
by Arthur Hiller; Starring Maximilian Schell, Lawrence Pressman, Lois
Nettleton, Luther Adler.
You
won’t see playwright/actor Robert Shaw’s name anywhere in the credits of this
film adaptation of his play because—in a departure from the AFT’s directive—the
text was changed in many places to allow for a more cinematic experience…and
Shaw was unhappy about it and had his name removed. However, director Hiller reports in an
interview (a DVD extra) that when Shaw saw the film prior to its premiere, he
was extremely pleased and asked that his name be reinstated, but it was too
late! Nevertheless, the film is a
riveting, first-rate drama featuring an Oscar-nominated, tour-de-force
performance by Schell. The story,
loosely inspired by the abduction and trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf
Eichmann, concerns a wealthy Jew in New York City who is captured by an Israeli
commando team and flown to Israel to stand trial as a concentration camp
commander. Is the Jew really the Nazi
colonel, or is he impersonating him because in truth he’s just a guilt-ridden
Holocaust survivor? The surprise ending
caps the American Film Theatre series with one of its best entries. 5 stars.
Philadelphia, Here
I Come! by
Brian Friel
Directed
by John Quested; w/ Donal McCann, Des Cave, Siobhan McKenna, Eamon Kelly,
Fidelma Murphy, David Kelly.
(Note:Â This film was not shown during the original
run of the subscription series for reasons unknown. It was, however, released with the other
thirteen pictures when they were re-issued as regular theatrical releases and
on home video.)Â The second film that was
purchased “pre-packaged†by Landau and the AFT, this Irish drama-comedy
concerns a young man named Gar and his reflections on his life as he prepares
to leave his small town in Ireland and emigrate to America. The theatrical conceit here is that Gar is
played by two different actors—his “public†self (McCann) whom everyone sees
and hears, and his “private†self (Cave), who is present to no one but the real
Gar and serves as the young man’s conscience, pointing out the brutal truth in
everything. It’s a small story with a
big heart. Fine performances all around,
especially from the rarely seen Siobhan McKenna as Gar’s housekeeper. Not a stand-out in the series, but certainly
not a bad one. 3 stars.
The
American Film Theatre could probably never be repeated, especially within the
economic structure that exists in the motion picture industry today. It’s a shame, for even though the AFT was not
a perfect product, it was a bold and fascinating experiment that attempted to
blend the stage with cinema. It’s the
kind of project that reminds us how recklessly courageous—and often
artistically brilliant—filmmakers could be in the 1970s.Â